----- Original Message ----- > Hi, > > as part of general housekeeping on our reviews, it was discussed at last > week's meeting [1] that we should set workflow -1 for stale reviews > (like gerrit used to do when I were a lad). > > The specific criteria discussed was 'items that have a -1 from a core > but no response from author for 14 days'. This topic came up again > during today's meeting and it wasn't clear if the intention was for > cores to start enforcing this? So: > > Do we start setting WIP/workflow -1 for those reviews that have a -1 > from a core but no response from author for 14 days > > thanks, marios > > [1] > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2014/tripleo.2014-09-09-19.04.log.html So it looks like this has already started.. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105275/ I think we need to document on the wiki *precisely* the criteria for setting WIP/workflow -1. For example that review above has a Jenkins failure but no core reviews at all. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >