Open Stack

I am also happy to sponsor it. I've already reviewed the patches...

On 09/05/2014 04:34 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Mike Wilson <geekinutah at gmail.com
> <mailto:geekinutah at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     I am requesting an exception for the juno-slaveification blueprint.
>     There is a single outstanding patch [1] which has already been
>     approved before, but needed to be re-spun due to gate failures which
>     then necessitated a rebase. For those not familiar with the work,
>     the spec[2] can shed some more light on the scope of work for Juno.
>
>     All the other patches from this blueprint have merged, the only
>     remaining patch really just needs a +W as it has been extensively
>     reviewed and already approved previously. This may be an easy
>     candidate since Andrew Laski, Jay Pipes and Dan Smith have reviewed
>     and +2'd this already.
>
>
> I am happy to sponsor this, as this is the last patch needed to finish a
> BP and the patch was approved once bit needed a rebase over some objects
> changes. The change from the approved version is pretty minor.
>
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Mike Wilson
>
>     [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103064/
>     [2]
>     http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova-specs/tree/specs/juno/juno-slaveification.rst
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>