[openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Horizon] Ironic Horizon API

Akihiro Motoki amotoki at gmail.com
Wed Sep 3 05:20:34 UTC 2014


Thanks for the clarification. This input is really useful to Horizon team too.
I understand the goal is to know the beta implementation has the right
direction.
It is a good startline to discuss what it should be.

Thanks,
Akihiro


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Josh Gachnang <josh at pcsforeducation.com> wrote:
> Right, the ASAP part is just to have a working Horizon for Ironic (proposed,
> not merged) with most of the features we want as we move towards the vote
> for graduation. We definitely understand the end-of-cycle crunch, as we're
> dealing with the same in Ironic. I'm just looking for a general "This code
> looks reasonable" or "Woah, don't do it like that", not trying to get it
> merged this late in the cycle.
>
> As for graduation, as I understand, we need to have code proposed to Horizon
> that we can work to merge after we graduate.
>
> Thanks!
>
> ---
> Josh Gachnang
> Tech Blog: ServerCobra.com, @ServerCobra
> Github.com/PCsForEducation
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Jim Rollenhagen <jim at jimrollenhagen.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On September 2, 2014 9:28:15 PM PDT, Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >Good to know we will have Ironic support. I can help the integration.
>> >
>> >Let me clarify the situation as Horizon core team. I wonder why it is
>> >ASAP.
>> >Horizon is released with integrated projects and it is true in Juno
>> >release
>> >too.
>> >Ironic is still incubated even if it is graduated for Kilo release.
>> >What is the requirement for graduation? More detail clarification is
>> >needed.
>> >All teams of the integrated projects are focusing on Juno releases and
>> >we all features will be reviewed after rc1 is shipped. The timing is a
>> >bit
>> >bad.
>>
>> Right, the Ironic team does not expect this to land in the Juno cycle. The
>> graduation requirement is that Ironic has made a good faith effort to work
>> toward a Horizon panel.
>>
>> We would like some eyes on the code to make sure we're moving the right
>> direction, but again, we don't expect this to land until Kilo.
>>
>> // jim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list