[openstack-dev] sign up for oslo liaisons for kilo cycle

Salvatore Orlando salv.orlando at gmail.com
Tue Oct 7 11:58:13 UTC 2014


I am totally not against it.
I agree with you that probably the restriction on core-only might be
lifted, but that decision lies with the oslo team.

Salvatore

On 7 October 2014 13:55, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 06/10/14 17:56, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > The Oslo team is responsible for managing code shared between
> > projects. There are a LOT more projects than Oslo team members, so
> > we created the liaison program at the beginning of the Juno cycle,
> > asking each team that uses Oslo libraries to provide one volunteer
> > liaison. Our liaisons facilitate communication and work with us to
> > make the application code changes needed as code moves out of the
> > incubator and into libraries. With this extra help in place, we
> > were able to successfully graduate 7 new libraries and begin having
> > them adopted across OpenStack.
> >
> > With the change-over to the new release cycle, it’s time to ask for
> > volunteers to sign up to be liaisons again. If you are interested
> > in acting as a liaison for your project, please sign up on the wiki
> > page [1]. It would be very helpful to have a full roster before the
> > summit, so we can make sure liaisons are invited to participate in
> > any relevant discussions there.
> >
> > Thanks, Doug
> >
> > [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/ProjectLiaisons
>
> Quoting the page: "The liaison should be a core reviewer for the
> project." Is it a reasonable limitation? I suspect that being an Oslo
> liaison usually does not really require the core status. Any team
> member with visible level of participation in the project and decent
> communication skills should be able to do the job.
>
> Why I ask: I would probably consider signing up for the liaison
> program from Neutron side if 1) the program rules would not be that
> tight; and 2) current Neutron Oslo liaison (Salvatore?) wouldn't be
> against it.
>
> Cheers,
> /Ihar
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
>
> iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUM9SVAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57jEYIAK3MTR+WwkHP9YxrexRQZl0R
> sJ5Y2fDZVbfUzypLIpOdEizTmPVs7jvHzUZnK48cgTG1RDiuO2BBZA0F08nsZnXN
> 9eJ6VABiD1ZRyctIa9yMeuSIspenDpJYWoPnnE6Z0y0vnJz0JlXnsgHRpvvIOwYI
> bS73fUlpr7X5bHBE4+QT1ByeWVklBjO/TPzmiyzeMONBw2sg2feRXKtWJ0S1COuv
> 04U7hvjbAn7ujP7nC8VhnRsIDqYoZ0l7I0zPuZXKqWLME6JLRL8XYt3GL77RCrLf
> tQJVynpRrAYCgM33NqqEqIxqnHo7gLHDjEj10ekUO+1d6ZFEdR48apA1Zc6Q7YM=
> =+HC1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141007/3c891343/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list