Hello All, In a nutshell, I've found the current IPMI Ceilometer sensor naming structure difficult to deal with from a programmatic perspective if a consumer wants to simply read all the sensors for a given Ironic Node. The current naming scheme just doesn't seem to provide a simple fast way to get all the sensors for a given Ironic Node from Ceilometer. I detailed what I learned and proposed a potential alternative naming structure to the Ironic/Ceilometer bugs as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1377157 I am curious as to what the intended use model was for the current naming scheme? Regards, Jim -- --- Jim Mankovich | jmank at hp.com (US Mountain Time) --- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141003/78e568c5/attachment.html>