On 20/11/14 20:17 +1100, Michael Still wrote: >Hi, > >as discussed at the summit, we want to do a better job of tracking the >progress of work on our priorities for Kilo. To that end, we have >agreed to discuss the current state of these at each nova meeting. > >I have created this etherpad: > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-priorities-tracking > >If you are the owner of a priority, please ensure it lists the reviews >you currently require before the meeting tomorrow. If you could limit >your entry to less than five reviews, that would be good. Should the glanceclient and glance_store adoption be listed there? I've a spec[0] for glanceclient and I'll work on the glance_store one now. [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/133485/ Flavio -- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141120/7c409e70/attachment.pgp>