[openstack-dev] [neutron] Is this fix introducing another different bug to dhcp-agent?

Ihar Hrachyshka ihrachys at redhat.com
Thu Nov 13 21:54:48 UTC 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Robert, Miguel,
do you plan to take care of the bug and the fix, or you need help? RDO
depends on the fix, also we should introduce the fix before the next
Juno release that includes the bad patch, so I would be glad to step
in if you don't have spare cycles.
/Ihar

On 13/11/14 16:44, Robert Li (baoli) wrote:
> Nice catch. Since it’s already merged, a new bug may be in order.
> 
> —Robert
> 
> On 11/13/14, 10:25 AM, "Miguel Ángel Ajo" <majopela at redhat.com 
> <mailto:majopela at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
> I believe this fix to IPv6 dhcp spawn breaks isolated metadata
> when we have a subnet combination like this on a network:
> 
> 1) IPv6 subnet, with DHCP enabled 2) IPv4 subnet, with isolated
> metadata enabled.
> 
> 
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123671/1/neutron/agent/dhcp_agent.py
>
>  I haven’t been able to test yet, but wanted to share it before I
> forget.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Miguel Ángel ajo @ freenode.net
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUZSioAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57WvIH/0pEFnXwPF9dKGbmWGvxgURW
Fec0SMxl544DUyKXfhy/fEJPiedAm63TcBbBRkcLrwrGrAI23iMvAi96tCuH/eb7
uYbgoDF16b6DGUg0V2bXh8OufpgoIn4T38Vwwr0MFhfxOLbux4QfK1MshsRF1XWx
LnzmLLnDuJvEYF/gq9ifAA0ekQ+OdwYaKpTEyoVXZNuSJzJOkY8BnwjPQTuRStYG
M1oBsIxO9j9C/fw1/lkIKasaq9Vmy5LtG+neOyQDzM6EjZrVKO+Z9ZbJnhlkIoaF
fL8dKqDBzDbFbHpE/pHcUSR5lMnBkHWjsfqC6w8NKpEKnPW6UN88oipSoB9h7U4=
=NfOp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list