Open Stack

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:16 AM, James E. Blair <jeblair at openstack.org> wrote:
> Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> writes:
>
>> James E. Blair wrote:
>>> openstack/oslo-specs -> openstack/common-libraries-specs
>>
>> I understand (and agree with) the idea that -specs repositories should
>> be per-program.
>>
>> That said, you could argue that "oslo" is a shorthand for "common
>> libraries" and is the code name for the *program* (rather than bound to
>> any specific project). Same way "infra" is shorthand for
>> "infrastructure". So I'm not 100% convinced this one is necessary...
>
> "data-processing-specs" has been pointed out as a similarly awkward
> name.  According to the programs.yaml file, each program does have a
> codename, and the compute program's codename is 'nova'.  I suppose we
> could have said the repos are per-program though using the program's
> codename.  But that doesn't actually help someone who wants to write a
> swift-bench spec know that it should go in the swift-specs repo.
>
> I'm happy to drop oslo from the rename list if Doug wants to mull this
> over a bit more.  The only thing I hate more than renaming repos is
> renaming repos twice.  I'm hoping we can have some kind of consistency,
> though.  People are in quite a hurry to have these created (we made 5
> more for official openstack programs yesterday, plus a handful for
> stackforge).

I don't feel strongly, and am prepared to go along with the consensus
on using the longer names.

Doug

>
> -Jim
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev