Open Stack

On May 9, 2014, at 3:36 PM, Eugene Nikanorov <enikanorov at mirantis.com<mailto:enikanorov at mirantis.com>>
 wrote:

Also we've heard objection to this approach several times from other core team members (this discussion has been going for more than half a year now), so I would suggest to move forward with single L2 port approach.

    Objections to multiple ports per loadbalancer or objections to the Loadbalancer object itself?

    If its the latter then you may have a valid argument by authority but its impossible to verify because these "core team members" are remaining silent through out all these discussions. We can't  be dissuaded due to FUD(Fear, Uncertainty and Doub)t  that these silent core team members will suddenly reject this discussion in the future. We aren't going to put our users at risk due to FUD.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140509/8f016720/attachment.html>