Open Stack

On 07/05/14 00:07, Clint Byrum wrote:
> +1 to the plans.
> 
> We've recently freed up a few more boxes for the HP region, and we'll
> be rolling those out as we migrate from saucy to trusty for the rest of
> the cloud. But we should do all of the things below anyway.

Thanks, didn't hear any objections, patch submitted
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92808/1

> 
> Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2014-05-06 15:34:41 -0700:
>> Hi,
>>
>>    I mentioned this at the tripleo meeting today and to get opinions out
>> there I'd like to bring it up here,
>>
>> In tripleo we are currently very tight on resources to run our CI jobs
>> and I'd like to scale back temporarily until we have either more
>> capacity or reorganize things a bit, to more efficiently use what we
>> have. Basically I'd like to see us do 3 things
>>
>> 1. Get rid of check-tripleo-seed-precise job
>>    This is currently a subset of both check-tripleo-undercloud-precise
>> and check-tripleo-overcloud-precise so is basically using up resources
>> with no extra gain, if we put plans in place to deploy the
>> undercloud/overcloud on a persistent seed we can add it back again.
>>
>> 2. Move the check-tripleo-ironic-undercloud-precise into the
>> experimental-tripleo queue, this test is non voting and currently
>> doesn't work, when its fixed we can put it back into the check-tripleo
>> queue and delete the check-tripleo-ironic-seed-precise job, as it should
>> be a subset of the ironic undercloud job (similar to the seed job
>> mentioned in point 1)
>>
>> 3. Get back onto 8G nodepool instances, we moved to 16G instances a
>> while back to work around a problem,
>>  I've a patch up that should allow us to get back to 8G nodes
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/91545/
>>
>> Any objections or alternate ideas?
>>
>> thanks,
>> Derek.
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>