[openstack-dev] OpenStack vs. SQLA 0.9

Brant Knudson blk at acm.org
Mon Mar 24 16:21:10 UTC 2014


There's a proposed change to Keystone to update SQLAlchemy to 0.9[0] which
is failing in the doc build. I'm not sure exactly what it's doing that's
causing it to fail. I proposed changes to work around the issues[1] based
on the error messages. Part of the fix requires a change in oslo-incubator
code[2]. So I think once these are merged (or a better fix is merged...),
Keystone will support SQLAlchemy 0.9.

[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82231/
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82370/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82370/

- Brant



On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Roman Podoliaka
<rpodolyaka at mirantis.com>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I think it's actually not that hard to fix the errors we have when
> using SQLAlchemy 0.9.x releases.
>
> I uploaded two changes two Nova to fix unit tests:
> - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80431/ (this one should also fix
> the Tempest test run error)
> - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80432/
>
> Thanks,
> Roman
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote:
> > On 03/14/2014 02:06 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> >> On 03/13/2014 12:31 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >>> On 03/12/2014 07:07 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> >>>> Because of where we are in the freeze, I think this should wait until
> >>>> Juno opens to fix. Icehouse will only be compatible with SQLA 0.8,
> which
> >>>> I think is fine. I expect the rest of the issues can be addressed
> during
> >>>> Juno 1.
> >>>>
> >>>>     -Sean
> >>>
> >>> Sean,
> >>>
> >>> No, it's not fine for me. I'd like things to be fixed so we can move
> >>> forward. Debian Sid has SQLA 0.9, and Jessie (the next Debian stable)
> >>> will be released SQLA 0.9 and with Icehouse, not Juno.
> >>
> >> We're past freeze, and this requires deep changes in Nova DB to work. So
> >> it's not going to happen. Nova provably does not work with SQLA 0.9, as
> >> seen in Tempest tests.
> >>
> >>       -Sean
> >
> > I'd be nice if we considered more the fact that OpenStack, at some
> > point, gets deployed on top of distributions... :/
> >
> > Anyway, if we can't do it because of the freeze, then I will have to
> > carry the patch in the Debian package. Never the less, someone will have
> > to work and fix it. If you know how to help, it'd be very nice if you
> > proposed a patch, even if we don't accept it before Juno opens.
> >
> > Thomas Goirand (zigo)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140324/e6ea0cd0/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list