[openstack-dev] Duplicate code for processing REST APIs
Solly Ross
sross at redhat.com
Fri Mar 14 19:55:30 UTC 2014
You're far from the only one who feels this way. It should be noted, however, that it would appear that the Oslo team is
trying to graduate some more of the modules into separate libraries. I talked to someone about the process, and they said
that the Oslo team is trying to graduate the "lowest" libraries on the dependency chart first, so that any graduated libraries
will have olso.xyz dependencies, and not code-sync dependencies.
Best Regards,
Solly Ross
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay S Bryant" <jsbryant at us.ibm.com>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 3:12:22 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Duplicate code for processing REST APIs
From: Duncan Thomas <duncan.thomas at gmail.com>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>,
Date: 03/14/2014 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Duplicate code for processing REST APIs
On 13 March 2014 21:13, Roman Podoliaka <rpodolyaka at mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> Code from openstack/common/ dir is 'synced' from oslo-incubator. The
> 'sync' is effectively a copy of oslo-incubator subtree into a project
> source tree. As syncs are not done at the same time, the code of
> synced modules may indeed by different for each project depending on
> which commit of oslo-incubator was synced.
Worth noting that there have been a few cases of projects patching
OSLO bugs intheir own tree rather than fixing in OSLO then resyncing.
If anybody has any tooling that can detect that, I'd love to see the
results.
I'm generally of the opinion that cinder is likely to be resistant to
more parts of OSLO being used in cinder unless they are a proper
library - syncs have caused us significant pain, code churn, review
load and bugs in the last 12 months. I am but one voice among many,
but I know I'm not the only member of core who feels this to be the
case. Hopefully I can spend some time with OSLO core at the summit and
discuss the problems I've found.
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Duncan,
I will come with you for that discussion. :-) Have some thoughts and questions to share as well.
Regardless, I think we need to make sure to actually get our Oslo syncs started for Cinder early
in Juno. We are way behind on db and db.sqlalchemy. Planning to propose changes to that as soon
as we switch over.
Jay
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list