Open Stack

Therve told me he actually tested this and it works.  Now if I could only 
configure DevStack to install a working Neutron...

Regards,
Mike



From:   "Fox, Kevin M" <Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov>
To:     Chris Armstrong <chris.armstrong at RACKSPACE.COM>, "OpenStack 
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>, 
Date:   03/13/2014 02:19 PM
Subject:        Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] 
OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember?



Hi Chris,

That's great to hear. I'm looking forward to installing icehouse and 
testing that out. :)

Thanks,
Kevin


From: Chris Armstrong [chris.armstrong at RACKSPACE.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 1:29 PM
To: Fox, Kevin M; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage 
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup 
and OS::Neutron::PoolMember?

Hi Kevin,

The design of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup should not require explicit 
support for load balancers. The design is meant to allow you to create a 
resource that wraps up both a OS::Heat::Server and a PoolMember in a 
template and use it via a Stack resource.

(Note that Mike was talking about the new OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup 
resource, not AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup).

So, while I haven’t tested this case with PoolMember specifically, and 
there may still be bugs, no more feature implementation should be 
necessary (I hope).

-- 
Christopher Armstrong
IRC: radix


On March 12, 2014 at 1:52:53 PM, Fox, Kevin M (kevin.fox at pnnl.gov) wrote:
I submitted a blueprint a while back that I think is relevant:

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/elasticloadbalancing-lbaas

Currently heat autoscaling doesn't interact with Neutron lbaas and the 
configurable bits aren't configurable enough to allow it without code 
changes as far as I can tell.

I think its only a few days of work, but the OpenStack CLA is preventing 
me from contributing. :/

Thanks,
Kevin


From: Mike Spreitzer [mspreitz at us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:34 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and 
OS::Neutron::PoolMember?

Has anybody exercised the case of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup scaling a 
nested stack that includes a OS::Neutron::PoolMember?  Should I expect 
this to work?

Thanks,
Mike
_______________________________________________ 
OpenStack-dev mailing list 
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org 
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140313/88af532f/attachment.html>