Open Stack

Hi Carl,

I really appreciate you for writing this up!
I have no hurdle to remove my -1 for the review.
I just thought it is an item easy to fix.

It is a great start line towards useufl developer documentation.

Thanks,
Akihiro


On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Collins, Sean
<Sean_Collins2 at cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know everyone is very busy working on the I-3 release, but I wanted
> solicit feedback on my developer documentation review.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72428/
>
> Currently, we have a couple +1's and a +2 from Nachi - Akihirio Motoki
> and Henry Gessau brought up valid points about the TESTING file, but I
> felt that they can be addressed in other patchsets - since I don't feel
> confident in making the changes that they suggested, and some of the
> comments refer to issues that exist in the
>
> In addition, we're almost to the goal line - I'd rather get some docs
> merged and update in another patchset, rather than update this review
> with another patchset, that clears out all the +2's and +1's and then
> wait for everyone to circle back and re-approve.
>
> I understand this is a unusual request and I am asking for special
> treatment, but Neutron is severely lacking in documentation for new
> developers and I think this patch moves us closer to fixing it.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Sean M. Collins
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev