[openstack-dev] [Openstack] Need unique ID for every Network Service

Srikanth Kumar Lingala srikanth.lingala at freescale.com
Mon Mar 3 11:59:38 UTC 2014


Hi Nikanorov,
Please add the below requirement to the agenda of coming weekly discussion on Thursday.

Regards,
Srikanth.

From: Srikanth Kumar Lingala [mailto:srikanth.lingala at freescale.com]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 5:18 PM
To: Stephen Balukoff; Veera Reddy
Cc: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org; openstack
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Need unique ID for every Network Service

Yes..I will send a mail to Eugene Nikanorov, requesting to add this to the agenda in the coming weekly discussion.
Detailed requirement is as follows:
In the current implementation, only one LBaaS configuration is possible per tenant. It is better to have multiple LBaaS configurations for each tenant.
We are planning to configure haproxy as VM in a Network Service Chain. In a chain, there may be possibility of multiple Network Services of the same type (For Eg: Haproxy). For that, each Network Service should have a Unique ID (UUID) for a tenant.

Regards,
Srikanth.

From: Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbalukoff at bluebox.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 1:22 AM
To: Veera Reddy
Cc: Lingala Srikanth Kumar-B37208; openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>; openstack
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Need unique ID for every Network Service

Hi y'all!

The ongoing debate in the LBaaS group is whether the concept of a 'Loadbalancer' needs to exist  as an entity. If it is decided that we need it, I'm sure it'll have a unique ID. (And please feel free to join the discussion on this as well, eh!)

Stephen

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Veera Reddy <veeraready at gmail.com<mailto:veeraready at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,

Good idea to have unique id for each entry of network functions.
So that we can configure multiple network function with different configuration.


Regards,
Veera.

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Srikanth Kumar Lingala <srikanth.lingala at freescale.com<mailto:srikanth.lingala at freescale.com>> wrote:
Hi-
In the existing Neutron, we have FWaaS, LBaaS, VPNaaS …etc.
In FWaaS, each Firewall has its own UUID.
It is good to have a unique ID [UUID] for LBaaS also.

Please share your comments on the above.

Regards,
Srikanth.

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack at lists.openstack.org>
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack


_______________________________________________
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack at lists.openstack.org>
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack



--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140303/ccf6fac5/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list