[openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Current status of Neutron 3rd Party CI and how to move forward

Anita Kuno anteaya at anteaya.info
Mon Jun 16 15:10:54 UTC 2014


On 06/16/2014 09:52 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
> I will probably be unable, as usual, to attend today's CI meeting (falls
> right around my dinner time).
I'm sorry to hear that, since I value your input in these matters. Your
CI system is doing an excellent job and I use it as an example for others.

Maybe we need to get you speaking somewhere so you can be in a different
time zone for the meeting? :D

Thanks Salvatore,
Anita.
> I think it's a good idea to starting keeping track of the status of the
> various CI systems, but I feel the etherpad will not work very well in the
> long term.
> 
> However, it would be great if we could start devising a solution for having
> "health" reports from the various CI systems.
> This report should report the following kind of information:
> - timestamp of last run
> - timestamp of last vote (a system might start job which then get aborted
> for CI infra problems)
> - % of success vs failures (not sure how important is that one but provides
> a metric of comparison with upstream jenkins)
> - % of disagreements with jenkins (this might allow us to quickly spot
> those CI systems which are randomly -1'ing patches)
> 
> The percentage metrics might be taken over a 48 hours or 7 days interval,
> or both.
> Does this idea sound reasonable?
> 
> Also, regarding [1]. I agree that more is always better...  but I would
> like a minimum required set of tests to be enforced.
> Is this something that can be achieved?
> 
> Salvatore
> 
> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 16 June 2014 07:07, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto at valinux.co.jp> wrote:
> 
>> hi,
>>
>>> My initial analysis of Neutron 3rd Party CI is here [1]. This was
>>> somewhat correlated with information from DriverLog [2], which was
>>> helpful to put this together.
>>
>> i updated the etherpad for ofagent.
>> currently a single CI system is running tests for both of ofagent and ryu.
>> is it ok?
>>
>> YAMAMOTO Takashi
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list