Open Stack

On 16 June 2014 15:58, Kyle Mestery <mestery at noironetworks.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Salvatore Orlando <sorlando at nicira.com>
> wrote:
> > I will probably be unable, as usual, to attend today's CI meeting (falls
> > right around my dinner time).
> > I think it's a good idea to starting keeping track of the status of the
> > various CI systems, but I feel the etherpad will not work very well in
> the
> > long term.
> >
> Agreed. The etherpad was a starting point, I'll move this information
> to a wiki page later today.
>
> > However, it would be great if we could start devising a solution for
> having
> > "health" reports from the various CI systems.
> > This report should report the following kind of information:
> > - timestamp of last run
> > - timestamp of last vote (a system might start job which then get aborted
> > for CI infra problems)
> > - % of success vs failures (not sure how important is that one but
> provides
> > a metric of comparison with upstream jenkins)
> > - % of disagreements with jenkins (this might allow us to quickly spot
> those
> > CI systems which are randomly -1'ing patches)
> >
> > The percentage metrics might be taken over a 48 hours or 7 days
> interval, or
> > both.
> > Does this idea sound reasonable?
> >
> This sounds like a very good idea. Now we just need to find someone
> with the time to write this. :)
>
> > Also, regarding [1]. I agree that more is always better...  but I would
> like
> > a minimum required set of tests to be enforced.
> > Is this something that can be achieved?
> >
> I think the tests that are in there are the minimum tests I'd like to
> see run. I'll clarify the language on the wiki page a bit.
>

If the intention is to have the minimum set of test "we'd like to see run"
then it's perfect!
I was trying to say we should impose that set as a minimum requirement...


>
> > Salvatore
> >
> > [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 16 June 2014 07:07, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto at valinux.co.jp> wrote:
> >>
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> > My initial analysis of Neutron 3rd Party CI is here [1]. This was
> >> > somewhat correlated with information from DriverLog [2], which was
> >> > helpful to put this together.
> >>
> >> i updated the etherpad for ofagent.
> >> currently a single CI system is running tests for both of ofagent and
> ryu.
> >> is it ok?
> >>
> >> YAMAMOTO Takashi
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140616/e9521f83/attachment.html>