[openstack-dev] [heat] health maintenance in autoscaling groups

Mike Spreitzer mspreitz at us.ibm.com
Fri Jul 25 04:01:52 UTC 2014


Doug Wiegley <dougw at a10networks.com> wrote on 07/23/2014 11:24:32 PM:

> Hi Mike,
> 
> > and listed the possible values of the status field, including 
> "INACTIVE".  Other sources are telling me that status=INACTIVE when 
> the health monitor thinks the member is unhealthy, status!=INACTIVE 
> when the health monitor thinks the member is healthy.  What's going on 
here? 
> 
> Indeed, the code will return a server status of INACTIVE if the 
> lbaas agent marks a member ‘DOWN’.  But, nowhere can I find that it 
> actually ever does so.
> 
> My statements about the status field for lbaas/neutron came from the
> author of the ref lbaas driver; I’ll check with him tomorrow and see
> if I misunderstood.

I did an experiment, and found that the PoolMember status did indeed 
switch between ACTIVE and INACTIVE depending on the health of the member.

Thanks,
Mike

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140725/e3bb2abd/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list