Open Stack

It might be more useful to make it a generic library which is used by relevant Openstack libraries



On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 3:36 AM, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:
 

On Jan 28, 2014, at 5:01 PM, Julien Danjou <julien at danjou.info> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 28 2014, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> 
>> There are several reviews related to adding VMware interface code to the
>> oslo-incubator so it can be shared among projects (start at
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/65075/7 if you want to look at the code).
>> 
>> I expect this code to be fairly stand-alone, so I wonder if we would be
>> better off creating an oslo.vmware library from the beginning, instead of
>> bringing it through the incubator.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
> 
> This sounds like a good idea, but it doesn't look OpenStack specific, so
> maybe building a non-oslo library would be better.
> 
> Let's not zope it! :)

+1 on not making it an oslo library.


> 
> -- 
> Julien Danjou
> # Free Software hacker # independent consultant
> # http://julien.danjou.info
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


-----------------
Donald Stufft
PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA



_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140128/ca00759a/attachment.html>