[openstack-dev] 答复: Proposed Logging Standards

Rossella Sblendido rossella at midokura.com
Tue Jan 28 09:42:24 UTC 2014

Hi Sean,

good idea, count me in!
I think it makes more sense for me to help in Neutron, that's the project
that I'm more familiar with.


On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Haiming Yang <laserjetyang at gmail.com>wrote:

>  I think it is also good for general i18n effort
>  ------------------------------
> 发件人: Christopher Yeoh <cbkyeoh at gmail.com>
> 发送时间: 2014/1/28 11:02
> 收件人: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> 主题: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
>  On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:
>> On 01/27/2014 09:07 AM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote:
>> > Hi Sean,
>> >
>> > I'm currently working on moving away from the "built-in" logging to use
>> log_config=<filename> and the python logging framework so that we can start
>> shipping to logstash/sentry/<insert other useful tool here>.
>> >
>> > I'd be very interested in getting involved in this, especially from a
>> "why do we have log messages that are split across multiple lines"
>> perspective!
>> Do we have many that aren't either DEBUG or TRACE? I thought we were
>> pretty clean there.
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Matt
>> >
>> > P.S. FWIW, I'd also welcome details on what the "Audit" level gives us
>> that the others don't... :)
>> Well as far as I can tell the AUDIT level was a prior drive by
>> contribution that's not being actively maintained. Honestly, I think we
>> should probably rip it out, because I don't see any in tree tooling to
>> use it, and it's horribly inconsistent.
> For the uses I've seen of it in the nova api code INFO would be perfectly
> fine in place of AUDIT.
> I'd be happy to help out with patches to cleanup the logging in n-api.
> One other thing to look at - I've noticed with logs is that when something
> like glanceclient code (just as an example) is called from nova,
> we can get ERROR level messages for say image not found when its actually
> perfectly expected that this will occur.
> I'm not sure if we should be changing the error level in glanceclient or
> just forcing any error logging in glanceclient when
> called from Nova to a lower level though.
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140128/e0d33176/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list