[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

Steve Doll sdoll at mirantis.com
Fri Jan 17 00:16:49 UTC 2014

Looking good, let me know if I can be of help to make some high-fidelity

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Jay Dobies <jason.dobies at redhat.com> wrote:

> This is a really good evolution. I'm glad the wireframes are getting
> closer to what we're doing for Icehouse.
> A few notes...
> On page 6, what does the Provisioning Status chart reflect? The math
> doesn't add up if that's supposed to reflect the free v. deployed. That
> might just be a sample data thing, but the term "Provisioning Status" makes
> it sound like this could be tracking some sort of ongoing provisioning
> operation.
> What's the distinction between the config shown on the first deployment
> page and the ones under "more options"? Is the idea that the ones on the
> overview page must be specified before the first deployment but the rest
> can be left to the defaults?
> The Roles (Resource Category) subtab disappeared but the edit role dialog
> is still there. How do you get to it?
> Super happy to see the progress stuff represented. I think it's a good
> first start towards handling the long running changes.
> I like the addition of the Undeploy button, but since it's largely a dev
> utility it feels a bit weird being so prominent. Perhaps consider moving it
> under scale deployment; it's a variation of scaling, just scaling back to
> nothing  :)
> You locked the controller count to 1 (good call for Icehouse) but still
> have incrementers on the scale page. That should also be disabled and
> hardcoded to 1, right?
> On 01/16/2014 08:41 AM, Hugh O. Brock wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 01:50:00AM +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>> thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes
>>> and tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe.
>>> http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/
>>> 2014-01-16_tripleo-ui-icehouse.pdf
>>> Hopefully we are able to deliver described set of features. But if
>>> you find something what is missing which is critical for the first
>>> release (or that we are implementing a feature which should not have
>>> such high priority), please speak up now.
>>> The wireframes are very close to implementation. In time, there will
>>> appear more views and we will see if we can get them in as well.
>>> Thanks all for participation
>>> -- Jarda
>> These look great Jarda, I feel like things are coming together here.
>> --Hugh
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


*Steve Doll*
Art Director, Mirantis Inc.
sdoll at mirantis.com
Mobile: +1-408-893-0525
Skype: sdoll-mirantis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140116/2933610d/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list