[openstack-dev] Meeting time congestion
slukjanov at mirantis.com
Wed Jan 15 12:24:48 UTC 2014
Agreed that -meeting3 is ok.
BTW my main concern is a process of managing overlaps between projects
meetings time, that'll harder and harder with increasing number of meeting
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Flavio Percoco <flavio at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 15/01/14 11:28 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
>>> I think that in case of adding additional meeting rooms, we'll need to
>>> avoid disparity between them in names. For example, currently we have a
>>> lot of folks in #os-meeting and not so many in #os-meeting-alt, if we'll
>>> have #os-meeting-alt-2 then we'll have even less folks there and it'll
>>> be the same like making meeting in project channel.
>>> So, probably it'll be better to have meeting rooms named
>>> #openstack-meeting-1(or -a?) and etc. and round robin meetings between
>>> this channels.
>> The trick is... renaming channels is hard, especially when 300 people
>> lurk in one and have their setups pointing to them. I'm not sure the
>> value of averaging lurking across meeting rooms outweighs the
>> inconvenience renaming creates for existing users.
>> There are already conflicts as people pick times that appear to be free
>> but are actually used every other week... so a third room is definitely
>> wanted. We can go and create #openstack-meeting3 (other suggestions
>> welcome) and then discuss a consistent naming scheme and/or if renaming
>> is such a good idea.
> -meeting3 sounds good to me!
>> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Flavio Percoco
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
Savanna Technical Lead
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev