[openstack-dev] [Solum] Devstack gate is failing

Noorul Islam K M noorul at noorul.com
Wed Jan 8 15:09:22 UTC 2014


Anne Gentle <anne at openstack.org> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda <
> noorul at noorul.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 8, 2014 6:11 PM, "Sean Dague" <sean at dague.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 01/07/2014 11:27 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
>> > > <gokrokvertskhov at mirantis.com> wrote:
>> > >> Should we rather revert patch to make gate working?
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > I think it is always good to have test packages reside in
>> > > test-requirements.txt. So -1 on reverting that patch.
>> > >
>> > > Here [1] is a temporary solution.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Noorul
>> > >
>> > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/65414
>> >
>> > If Solum is trying to be on the road to being an OpenStack project, why
>> > would it go out of it's way to introduce an incompatibility in the way
>> > all the actual OpenStack packages work in the gate?
>> >
>> > Seems very silly to me, because you'll have to add oslo.sphinx back into
>> > test-requirements.txt the second you want to be considered for
>> incubation.
>> >
>>
>> I am not sure why it seems silly to you. We are not anyhow removing
>> oslo.sphinx from the repository. We are just removing it before installing
>> the packages from test-requirements.txt
>>
> in the devstack gate. How does that affects incubation? Am I missing
>> something?
>>
>
> Docs are a requirement, and contributor docs are required for applying for
> incubation. [1] Typically these are built through Sphinx and consistency is
> gained through oslo.sphinx, also eventually we can offer consistent
> extensions. So a perception that you're skipping docs would be a poor
> reflection on your incubation application. I don't think that's what's
> happening here, but I want to be sure you understand the consistency and
> doc needs.
>
> See also
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-January/023582.htmlfor
> similar issues, we're trying to figure out the best solution. Stay
> tuned.
>

I have seen that, also posted solum issue [1] there yesterday. I started
this thread to have consensus on making solum devstack gate non-voting
until the issue gets fixed. Also proposed a temporary solution with
which we can solve the issue for the time being. Since the gate is
failing for all the patches, it is affecting every patch.

Regards,
Noorul

[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-January/023618.html
[2] https://review.openstack.org/65414

>
>
> 1.
> https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/reference/incubation-integration-requirements
>
>> Regards,
>> Noorul
>>
>> >         -Sean
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sean Dague
>> > Samsung Research America
>> > sean at dague.net / sean.dague at samsung.com
>> > http://dague.net
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list