Open Stack

On 5 January 2014 04:22, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote:
> Sean,
>
> Before everything, I'd like to thank you for insisting in making the
> transition to SQLA 0.8.x.
>
> Since it has been uploaded to Sid, this SQLA <0.7.99 has been without
> any doubt the biggest reoccurring pain in the but with the packaging of
> OpenStack. Without people like you, insisting again and again, I would
> have loose hope that progress could happen in OpenStack! So thanks
> again, Sean.
>

> We're even more into sci-fi when we see stuff like:
>
> pbr>=0.5.21,<1
>
> Monty, did you decide you would release 1.0 with lots of backward
> incompatibility? Has the topic been raised and I missed it??? I'm
> convinced this isn't the case (and let's pretend it isn't, just until
> the end of this message).

Strictly speak, yes. More generously, this should be

pbr>=0.5.21,<2

Because pbr is using semver, and 0.x has no stability guarantees, so
the point when we will hit an incompatible change to a stable API is
the 2 transition.

-Rob

-- 
Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud