[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Vertica Storage Driver Testing
Herndon, John Luke
john.herndon at hp.com
Thu Jan 2 23:40:43 UTC 2014
On 1/2/14, 4:27 PM, "Clint Byrum" <clint at fewbar.com> wrote:
>Excerpts from Herndon, John Luke's message of 2014-01-02 15:16:26 -0800:
>> I¹m working on adding a vertica (www.vertica.com) storage driver to
>> ceilometer. I would love to get this driver into upstream. However, I¹ve
>> run into a bit of a snag with the tests. It looks like all of the
>> storage drivers have ³in-memory² versions that are used for unit tests.
>> Vertica does not have an in-memory implementation, and is not trivial to
>> set-up. Given this constraint, I don¹t think it will be possible to run
>> unit tests ³out-of-the-box² against a real vertica database.
>Well arguably those other implementations aren't really running against
>a real database either so I don't see a problem with this.
>> Vertica is mostly sql compliant, so I could use a sqlite or h2 backend
>> test the query parts of the driver. Data loading can¹t be done with
>> sqlite, and will probably need to be tested with mocks. Is this an
>> acceptable approach for unit tests, or do the tests absolutely need to
>> against the database under test?
>A fake Vertica or mocking it out seems like a good idea. I'm not deeply
>involved with Ceilometer, but in general I think it is preferable to
>test only the _code_ in unit tests. However, it may be a good idea to
>adopt an approach similar to Nova's approach and require that a 3rd
>party run Vertica integration tests in the gate.
I don’t think it would be that hard to get the review or gate jobs to use
a real vertica instance, actually. Who do I talk to about that?
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 5443 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the OpenStack-dev