[openstack-dev] [Nova] why force_config_drive is a per comptue node config

Jiang, Yunhong yunhong.jiang at intel.com
Thu Feb 27 21:34:41 UTC 2014



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Still [mailto:mikal at stillhq.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 1:04 PM
> To: yunhong jiang
> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] why force_config_drive is a per
> comptue node config
> 
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:34 AM, yunhong jiang
> <yunhong.jiang at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Greeting,
> >         I have some questions on the force_config_drive configuration
> options
> > and hope get some hints.
> >         a) Why do we want this? Per my understanding, if the user
> want to use
> > the config drive, they need specify it in the nova boot. Or is it
> > because possibly user have no idea of the cloudinit installation in the
> > image?
> 
> It is possible for a cloud admin to have only provided images which
> work with config drive. In that case the admin would want to force
> config drive on, to ensure that instances always boot correctly.

So would it make sense to keep it as image property, instead of compute node config?

> 
> >         b) even if we want to force config drive, why it's a compute
> node
> > config instead of cloud wise config? Compute-node config will have
> some
> > migration issue per my understanding.
> 
> That's a fair point. It should probably have been a flag on the api
> servers. I'd file a bug for that one.

Thanks, and I can cook a patch for it. Still I think it will be better if we use image property?

--jyh

> 
> Michael
> 
> --
> Rackspace Australia
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list