A thread [1] was also initiated on the ML by Syvlain but no answers/comment for the moment. [1] http://openstack.markmail.org/thread/qy6ikldtq2o4imzl Édouard. On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:35 AM, 黎林果 <lilinguo8212 at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks you very much. > > "IMHO when admin_state_up is false that entity should be down, meaning > network should be down. > otherwise what it the usage of admin_state_up ? same is true for port > admin_state_up" > > It likes switch's power button? > > 2014-02-24 16:03 GMT+08:00 Assaf Muller <amuller at redhat.com>: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> Hi, > >> > >> I want to know the admin_state_up attribute about networks but I > >> have not found any describes. > >> > >> Can you help me to understand it? Thank you very much. > >> > > > > There's a discussion about this in this bug [1]. > > From what I gather, nobody knows what admin_state_up is actually supposed > > to do with respect to networks. > > > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1237807 > > > >> > >> Regard, > >> > >> Lee Li > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140225/05605461/attachment.html>