Open Stack

On 02/24/2014 06:31 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 17:59 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
>> So we do really need to be pragmatic here as well. Because our
>> experience with v3 so far has been doing a major version bump on Nova is
>> a minimum of 2 years, and that doesn't reach a completion point that
>> anyone's happy with to switch over.
> 
> I don't see why version 4 need repeat the timeline of v3 development.
> I'm not saying it isn't possible, just that one doesn't necessarily lead
> to the other.
> 
> Best,
> -jay

I guess having watched this evolve, it's not clear to me how to do it in
a shorter time frame. Maybe we just made tons of mistakes in the
process, but it seems like anything large like this is really 3 - 4
cycles. That was the cells timeline, that's been the baremetal story
timeline. Even the scheduler forklift, that everyone thought could
happen in a single cycle, is probably going to be 3 cycles start to finish.

Ways in which we could do this quicker would be appreciated. Though I do
like getting a few hours of sleep a night.

	-Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
Samsung Research America
sean at dague.net / sean.dague at samsung.com
http://dague.net

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140224/3d1ffecc/attachment.pgp>