Open Stack

Mark,

I'm not sure I understand what are implementation details in the workflow I
have proposed in the email above, could you point to them?

Thanks,
Eugene.



On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Mark McClain <mmcclain at yahoo-inc.com>wrote:

>
>  On Feb 21, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I disagree on this point. I believe that the more implementation details
> bleed into the API, the harder the API is to evolve and improve, and the
> less flexible the API becomes.
>
> I'd personally love to see the next version of the LBaaS API be a
> complete breakaway from any implementation specifics and refocus itself
> to be a control plane API that is written from the perspective of the
> *user* of a load balancing service, not the perspective of developers of
> load balancer products.
>
>
> I agree with Jay.  We the API needs to be user centric and free of
> implementation details.  One of my concerns I've voiced in some of the IRC
> discussions is that too many implementation details are exposed to the user.
>
>  mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140224/ac39818a/attachment.html>