[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

Samuel Bercovici SamuelB at Radware.com
Tue Feb 18 08:18:11 UTC 2014


Hi,

It matters, as someone might need to "debug" the backend setup and the name, if exists, can add details.
This obviously a vendor's choice if they wish to push this back to backend but the API should not remove this as a choice.

-Sam.


From: Eugene Nikanorov [mailto:enikanorov at mirantis.com]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 12:24 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

Folks,

I wonder why using names on the backend could be needed? For the code there is no much difference between name and the id.

Thanks,
Eugene.

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Samuel Bercovici <SamuelB at radware.com<mailto:SamuelB at radware.com>> wrote:
Hi,

My concern is that if from some reason the driver implementer would like to reflect the name also in the backend device, than an update should also be calling the driver.
Using readable names also makes sense on the back-end device.

-Sam.


From: Oleg Bondarev [mailto:obondarev at mirantis.com<mailto:obondarev at mirantis.com>]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 11:30 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Eugene Nikanorov <enikanorov at mirantis.com<mailto:enikanorov at mirantis.com>> wrote:
Hi Avishay,

1) I think name might be useful. Consider user forms a list of rules which route requests to a pool with static images or static pages, it may make sense to give those policy a name 'static-iamges', 'static-pages', rather then operate on ids.
+1


2) I think updating the name is useful as well, but just on DB level, so there is no point in calling the driver and communicating with the backend.
+1

Thanks,
Eugene.

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Avishay Balderman <AvishayB at radware.com<mailto:AvishayB at radware.com>> wrote:
Hi
L7Policy  holds a list of L7rules plus 1 attribute: "name" .
Questions:

1)      Do we need to have this name attribute?

2)      Do we want to allow update operation of the name attribute? Do we need to invoke the driver when such update occurred?

Thanks

Avishay

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140218/29a0f84f/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list