Open Stack

>
> I propose we do this in future TC meetings, time permitting. I
> propose we start with projects where the PTL was also elected to the TC,
> so that we give this new review's process some mileage.


+1, good idea


On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>wrote:

> Dina Belova wrote:
> >     Perhaps we should start putting each project on the TC agenda for a
> >     review of its current standing.  For any gaps, I think we should set
> a
> >     specific timeframe for when we expect these gaps to be filled.
> >
> >
> > Really good idea. New requirements are great, but frankly speaking not
> > all currently integrated projects fit all of them.
> > Will be nice to find out all gaps there and fix them asap.
>
> Agreed. I propose we do this in future TC meetings, time permitting. I
> propose we start with projects where the PTL was also elected to the TC,
> so that we give this new review's process some mileage.
>
> So.. Nova, Cinder, Neutron ?
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 

Best regards,

Dina Belova

Software Engineer

Mirantis Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140206/3a730dfc/attachment.html>