Open Stack

On Saturday, December 13, 2014, Deepak Shetty <dpkshetty at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think you completely mis-understood my Q
> I am completely in agreement for _not_ putting CI status in mailing list.
>
> Let me rephrase:
>
> As of now, I see 2 places where CI status is being tracked:
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems (clicking on the Link
> tells u the status)
> and
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status (one of
> column is status column)
>
> How are the 2 different ? Do we need to update both ?
>
> thanx,
> deepak
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Anita Kuno <anteaya at anteaya.info
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','anteaya at anteaya.info');>> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/12/2014 03:28 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Anita Kuno <anteaya at anteaya.info
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','anteaya at anteaya.info');>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 12/11/2014 09:36 AM, Jon Bernard wrote:
>> >>> Heya, quick Ceph CI status update.  Once the test_volume_boot_pattern
>> >>> was marked as skipped, only the revert_resize test was failing.  I
>> have
>> >>> submitted a patch to nova for this [1], and that yields an all green
>> >>> ceph ci run [2].  So at the moment, and with my revert patch, we're in
>> >>> good shape.
>> >>>
>> >>> I will fix up that patch today so that it can be properly reviewed and
>> >>> hopefully merged.  From there I'll submit a patch to infra to move the
>> >>> job to the check queue as non-voting, and we can go from there.
>> >>>
>> >>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139693/
>> >>> [2]
>> >>
>> http://logs.openstack.org/93/139693/1/experimental/check-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph/12397fd/console.html
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>>
>> >> Please add the name of your CI account to this table:
>> >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems
>> >>
>> >> As outlined in the third party CI requirements:
>> >> http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#requirements
>> >>
>> >> Please post system status updates to your individual CI wikipage that
>> is
>> >> linked to this table.
>> >>
>> >
>> > How is posting status there different than here :
>> > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status
>> >
>> > thanx,
>> > deepak
>> >
>>
>> >
>> >
>>
> Deepak,

We have been using the Cinder wiki page to track development of each CI and
to communicate issues within the Cinder community.  The general wiki is for
tracking the state of all the different CI systems.

So, I would say that both should be updated right now, eventually the
Cinder one should be deprecated.

Jay

> > _______________________________________________
>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org');>
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>> There are over 100 CI accounts now and growing.
>>
>> Searching the email archives to evaluate the status of a CI is not
>> something that infra will do, we will look on that wikipage or we will
>> check the third-party-announce email list (which all third party CI
>> systems should be subscribed to, as outlined in the third_party.html
>> page lined above).
>>
>> If we do not find information where we have asked you to put it and were
>> we expect it, we may disable your system until you have fulfilled the
>> requirements as outlined in the third_party.html page linked above.
>>
>> Sprinkling status updates amongst the emails posted to -dev and
>> expecting the infra team and other -devs to find them when needed is
>> unsustainable and has been for some time, which is why we came up with
>> the wikipage to aggregate them.
>>
>> Please direct all further questions about this matter to one of the two
>> third-party meetings as linked above.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Anita.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org');>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>

-- 
jsbryant at electronicjungle.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141214/2e6c51d0/attachment.html>