Open Stack

Le 14 août 2014 22:02, "Michael Still" <mikal at stillhq.com> a écrit :
>
> Hi.
>
> We're rapidly approaching j-3, so I want to remind people of the
> current reviews that are high priority. The definition of high
> priority I am using here is blueprints that are marked high priority
> in launchpad that have outstanding code for review -- I am sure there
> are other reviews that are important as well, but I want us to try to
> land more blueprints than we have so far. These are listed in the
> order they appear in launchpad.
>
> == Compute Manager uses Objects (Juno Work) ==
>
>
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/compute-manager-objects-juno,n,z
>
> This is ongoing work, but if you're after some quick code review
> points they're very easy to review and help push the project forward
> in an important manner.
>
> == Move Virt Drivers to use Objects (Juno Work) ==
>
> I couldn't actually find any code out for review for this one apart
> from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94477/, is there more out there?
>
> == Add a virt driver for Ironic ==
>
> This one is in progress, but we need to keep going at it or we wont
> get it merged in time.
>
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111223/ was approved, but a rebased
> ate it. Should be quick to re-approve.
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111423/
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111425/
> * ...there are more reviews in this series, but I'd be super happy to
> see even a few reviewed
>
> == Create Scheduler Python Library ==
>
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82778/
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104556/
>
> (There are a few abandoned patches in this series, I think those two
> are the active ones but please correct me if I am wrong).
>

Nope that's OK, those are the only one implementing the spec. We had a +2
on 82778 but it needed a rebase, FYI.

> == VMware: spawn refactor ==
>
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104145/
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104147/ (Dan Smith's -2 on this one
> seems procedural to me)
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105738/
> * ...another chain with many more patches to review
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
> --
> Rackspace Australia
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140814/240cb35e/attachment.html>