I am sorry that I could not attend the GBP meeting. Is there any reason why the IEFT standard is not considered? http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3198 I would like to understand the argument why we are creating new names instead of using the standard ones. Edgar From: Ronak Shah <ronak.malav.shah at gmail.com<mailto:ronak.malav.shah at gmail.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>> Date: Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 1:17 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming Hi, Following a very interesting and vocal thread on GBP for last couple of days and the GBP meeting today, GBP sub-team proposes following name changes to the resource. policy-point for endpoint policy-group for endpointgroup (epg) Please reply if you feel that it is not ok with reason and suggestion. I hope that it wont be another 150 messages thread :) Ronak -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140807/1c7cf4eb/attachment.html>