[openstack-dev] Fwd: FW: [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

Ivar Lazzaro ivarlazzaro at gmail.com
Thu Aug 7 00:04:36 UTC 2014


Hi Pedro,

I agree that having as much users/operators as possible using the API is
the winner option.
I think you should move this comment also in the main thread since it looks
that the Subject has been accidentally modified.

Cheers,
Ivar.


On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Pedro Marques <pedro.r.marques at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Aug 6, 2014, at 3:56 PM, Armando M. <armamig at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 6 August 2014 15:47, Kevin Benton <blak111 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think we should merge it and just prefix the API for now with
>> '/your_application_will_break_after_juno_if_you_use_this/'
>>
>
> And you make your call based and what pros and cons exactly, If I am ask?
>
> Let me start:
>
> Option 1:
>   - pros
>     - immediate delivery vehicle for consumption by operators
>
>
> Since our collective goal is to maximize the benefits for OpenStack
> users/operators, that seems to be the winner.
>
>   - cons
>     - code is burder from a number of standpoints (review, test, etc)
>
>
> Any piece of code is a burden.
>
>
> Option 2:
>   - pros
>     - enable a small set of Illuminati to iterate faster
>
>
> This is probably not intentional from your part ,but your choice of words
> make it seem that you are deriding the efforts of the team behind this
> effort. While i may disagree technically here and there with their current
> design, it seems to me that the effort in question is rather broad based in
> terms of support (from multiple different organizations) and that the team
> has put a non trivial effort in making the effort public. I don't think we
> can characterize the team either as a "secret group" or a "small set".
>
>   Pedro.
>
>
>   - cons
>     - integration burden with other OpenStack projects (keystone, nova,
> neutron, etc)
>
> Cheers,
> Armando
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140807/fc092220/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list