Open Stack

? 2014?04?10? 15:59, Irena Berezovsky ??:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks a lot the inputs you posted in the doc.
>
> I have raised there few questions and added use case for High 
> Availability.
>
> Another concern I have is regarding the assumption that there is no 
> case to mix different vendor cards in the setup. I think that mixing 
> Cisco and Intel or Mellanox cards does not make sense, but Intel and 
> Mellanox cards can coexist. At least for my understanding, but I may 
> be wrong, both Intel and Mellanox take HW VEB (HW embedded switch) 
> approach.
>
1. open to mail list.
2. admin/usr won't mixing Intel/Cisco/Mellanox card...., does not mean 
we should disable it, or don't give a chance.
3. i raise couple of question and questioning the aggregate solution. 
see inline comments.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zgMaXqrCnad01-jQH7Mkmf6amlghw9RMScGLBrKslmw/edit

Yongli He
>
> Thanks,
>
> Irena
>
> *From:*Robert Li (baoli) [mailto:baoli at cisco.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 09, 2014 11:11 PM
> *To:* Irena Berezovsky; Sandhya Dasu (sadasu); Robert Kukura; He, 
> Yongli (yongli.he at intel.com); Itzik Brown; beagles at redhat.com
> *Subject:* Re: PCI SR-IOV use cases initial doc
>
> Hi,
>
> I updated the doc with some of my thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Robert
>
> On 3/24/14, 8:41 AM, "Irena Berezovsky" <irenab at mellanox.com 
> <mailto:irenab at mellanox.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I have created the initial doc to capture PCI SR-IOV networking
>     use cases:
>
>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zgMaXqrCnad01-jQH7Mkmf6amlghw9RMScGLBrKslmw/edit
>
>     I have updated the agenda for tomorrow meeting to discuss the use
>     cases.
>
>     Please comment and update
>
>     BR,
>
>     Irena
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140410/8fe91aae/attachment.html>