[openstack-dev] [nova] Server Groups are not an optional element, bug or feature ?

Robert Collins robertc at robertcollins.net
Wed Apr 9 14:45:59 UTC 2014


On 10 April 2014 02:32, Chris Friesen <chris.friesen at windriver.com> wrote:
> On 04/09/2014 03:45 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Russell Bryant
>
>
>>> We were thinking that there may be a use for being able to query a
>>> full list of instances (including the deleted ones) for a group.
>>> The API just hasn't made it that far yet.  Just hiding them for now
>>> leaves room to iterate and doesn't prevent either option (exposing
>>> the deleted instances, or changing to auto- delete them from the
>>> group).
>
>
>> Maybe it's just me, but I have a natural aversion to anything that
>> grows forever in the database - over time and at scale this becomes a
>> real problem.
>
>
> Not just you.  I want my main database to reflect the current active data.
> Historical data should go somewhere else.

+1. Fastest way to make an OLTP workload crawl is to mix it up with warehousing.

-Rob

-- 
Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list