Open Stack

Clint Byrum wrote:
> My point is this: The summit isn't just about us sitting around pushing
> our vision.  We need to be open to the OpenStack Deployment tool chain
> supporting other deployment models. So while I'm not sure calling it
> "Deployment" will have a positive effect, I am also not sure that calling
> it "TripleO" is the right answer either. Thoughts?

Robert followed up privately and a few hours ago we renamed the topic to
"TripleO (Deployment)".

Cheers,

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)