[openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: bp/instance-group-api-extension

Debojyoti Dutta ddutta at gmail.com
Fri Sep 6 19:57:53 UTC 2013


+1 Gary

If this was allowed in H2 and not stopped due to the mandatory
requirement to use API objects (then), this feature would have
definitely seen the light of day (and we would have improved it to use
the objects/v3api anyway). This API leads to a bunch of new features
that make Openstack even better in terms of resource allocation,
scheduling, policies etc. Hence a little sad.

Hopefully we will have better luck next time :) Thanks to all the
reviewers esp Chris Yeoh, Dan Smith, Alex Xu and Russell Bryant for
their time. Thanks Thierry for trying to help with the FFE!

debo

On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Gary Kotton <gkotton at vmware.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 9/6/13 5:07 PM, "Russell Bryant" <rbryant at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>On 09/06/2013 05:06 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>>> Debojyoti Dutta wrote:
>>>> As per my IRC chats with dansmith, russellb, this feature needs the
>>>> user auth checks (being taken care of in
>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1221396).
>>>>
>>>> Dan has some more comments ....
>>>>
>>>> Could we please do a FFE for this one .... has been waiting for a long
>>>> time and we have done all that we were asked relatively quickly ....
>>>> in H2 it was gated by API object refactor. Most of the current
>>>> comments (pre last one by Dan) are due to
>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1221396
>>>
>>> This sounds relatively self-contained and ready. If you can get it
>>> merged (with the additional bugfix) before the release meeting Tuesday,
>>> personally I'm fine with it.
>>>
>>
>>I originally was fine with a FFE for this.  However, after some
>>discussion yesterday, it seems there are quite a few comments on the
>>review.  There's more iterating to do on this, so I don't have a high
>>confidence that we can merge it in time.
>>
>>I would hate to grant the FFE, have you work super hard to iterate on
>>this quickly, and it still not make it in time.  I think at this point
>>we should just defer to Icehouse to ensure that there is proper time to
>>do the updates and get good review on them.
>
> I am a little sad that this not been granted an FFE. We worked really hard
> on this. To be honest it was ready for review at the end of H2. I guess
> that our goal will now be to get this valuable feature in beginning of the
> Icehouse release.
>
> Thanks
> Gary
>
>>
>>NACK on the FFE.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>--
>>Russell Bryant
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
-Debo~



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list