Hi John! Thank you for your reply:) Sorry for inline comment. We also need something that doesn't clash with the cross-service > request id, as that is doing something slightly different. Would > "idempotent-request-id" work better? > Oh, yes. Did you say about this BP( https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cross-service-request-id )? (I am going to go that HK session.) So, I will user your opinion, and I try to go forward. Also, I assume we are only adding this into the v3 API? We should > close the v2 API for additions I guess? > Now I only adapt into v2 API, so it is aloso necessary to cope with the v3 API. Did I answer your question? Sincerely, Haruka Tanizawa -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131030/6f71cb6a/attachment.html>