Open Stack

Is this really a viable solution? 
I believe its more "democratic to ensure everyone gets a chance to present the blueprint" someone has spent time to write. This was no favoritism or biased view will ever take place and we let the community gauge the interest. 

/Alan

-----Original Message-----
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbryant at redhat.com] 
Sent: October-24-13 5:08 PM
To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint review process

On 10/24/2013 10:52 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/24/13 4:46 PM, "Dan Smith" <dms at danplanet.com> wrote:
> 
>>> In the last meeting we discussed an idea that I think is worth 
>>> trying at least for icehouse-1 to see if we like it or not.  The 
>>> idea is that
>>> *every* blueprint starts out at a Low priority, which means "best 
>>> effort, but no promises".  For a blueprint to get prioritized 
>>> higher, it should have 2 nova-core members signed up to review the resulting code.
>>
>> Huge +1 to this. I'm in favor of the whole plan, but specifically the 
>> prioritization piece is very important, IMHO.
> 
> I too am in favor of the idea. It is just not clear how 2 Nova cores 
> will be signed up.

Good point, there was no detail on that.  I propose just comments on the blueprint whiteboard.  It can be something simple like this to indicate that Dan and I have agreed to review the code for something:

    "nova-core reviewers: russellb, dansmith"

--
Russell Bryant

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev