[openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint review process

Russell Bryant rbryant at redhat.com
Thu Oct 24 15:07:52 UTC 2013


On 10/24/2013 10:52 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/24/13 4:46 PM, "Dan Smith" <dms at danplanet.com> wrote:
> 
>>> In the last meeting we discussed an idea that I think is worth trying at
>>> least for icehouse-1 to see if we like it or not.  The idea is that
>>> *every* blueprint starts out at a Low priority, which means "best
>>> effort, but no promises".  For a blueprint to get prioritized higher, it
>>> should have 2 nova-core members signed up to review the resulting code.
>>
>> Huge +1 to this. I'm in favor of the whole plan, but specifically the
>> prioritization piece is very important, IMHO.
> 
> I too am in favor of the idea. It is just not clear how 2 Nova cores will
> be signed up.

Good point, there was no detail on that.  I propose just comments on the
blueprint whiteboard.  It can be something simple like this to indicate
that Dan and I have agreed to review the code for something:

    "nova-core reviewers: russellb, dansmith"

-- 
Russell Bryant



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list