Open Stack

Hi,

I also collect the tests status for nova v3 api manually. You can find 
the status of v3 tests in this link: 
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-v3-tests

Because there are some extensions that just extend the attribute of 
specific api reponse, or convert some input before specific api
called. There is no url for these extension, but I think we also need 
check them. I collect the tempest tests according to the nova api code. 
check tests to the action
one by one, list the status file by file.

Due to these patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39609/ and 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39621/ are still under reviewing. so we 
can't add tempest test for nova v3 api. (almost existing tests have been 
ported into v3, but these patches depend on the 39609 and 39621). The 
status of porting existing tests is also listed in this link. we will 
add the missing tests in v2
firstly, when it can be ported into v3, will port it.
*__*
Best Regards
Ivan Zhu

On 2013?10?15? 14:25, Masayuki Igawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First, thank you to an anonymous for updating this list!
>      -> GET /{project_id}/servers/:server_id/diagnostics
>
> And, I have updated: Nova API List for Missing Tempest Tests.
>    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmYuZ6T4IJETdEVNTWlYVUVOWURmOERSZ0VGc1BBQWc
>
> The summary of this list:
> 					different count from
> Tested or not     # of APIs	ratio	the last time
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Tested API		124	 49.6%		+2
> Not Tested API		 66	 26.4%		-2
> Not Need to Test(*1)	 60	 24.0%		 0
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Total(*2): 		250	100.0%		 0
> (*1) Because they are deprecated APIs such as nova-network and volume.
> (*2) not included v3 APIs
>
> The tempest version is:
>   commit f55f4e54ceab7c6a4d330f92c8059e46233e3560
>   Merge: 86ab238 062e30a
>   Author: Jenkins <jenkins at review.openstack.org>
>   Date:   Mon Oct 14 15:55:59 2013 +0000
>
> By the way, I saw a design summit proposal related to this topic(*3). I think
> this information should be generated automatically. So I'd like to talk about
> this topic at the summit session.
> (*3) Coverage analysis tooling: http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/171
>
> This information would be useful for creating Tempest tests.
> Any comments/questions/suggestions are welcome.
>
> Best Regards,
> -- Masayuki Igawa
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> # I'm sorry for this resending because my last mail has unnecessary messages.
>>
>>
>> I have updated: Nova API List for Missing Tempest Tests.
>>   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmYuZ6T4IJETdEVNTWlYVUVOWURmOERSZ0VGc1BBQWc
>>
>> The summary of this list:
>> 					different count from
>> Tested or not    # of APIs	ratio	the last time
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> Tested API		122	 48.8%		+5
>> Not Tested API		 68	 27.2%		-5
>> Not Need to Test(*1)	 60	 24.0%		 0
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> Total(*2): 		250	100.0%		 0
>>
>> (*1) Because they are deprecated APIs such as nova-network and volume.
>> (*2) not included v3 APIs
>>
>> I hope this information would be helpful for creating Tempest tests.
>> Any comments and questions are welcome.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> -- Masayuki Igawa
>>
>>
>>> Hi, Tempest developers
>>>
>>> I have made:
>>>   Nova API List for Missing Tempest Tests.
>>>   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmYuZ6T4IJETdEVNTWlYVUVOWURmOERSZ0VGc1BBQWc
>>>
>>> This list shows what we should test. That is:
>>>   * Nova has 250 APIs(not include v3 APIs).
>>>   * 117 APIs are executed(maybe tested).
>>>   * 73 APIs are not executed.
>>>   * 60 APIs are not executed. But they maybe not need to test.
>>>       -> Because they are deprecated APIs such as nova-network and volume.
>>>
>>> So I think we need more tempest test cases.
>>> If this idea is acceptable, can you put your name to 'assignee' at your favorites,
>>> and implement tempest tests.
>>>
>>> Any comments are welcome.
>>>
>>> Additional information:
>>>   I made this API list with modification of nova's code that based on
>>>   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/25882/ (Abandoned).
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> -- Masayuki Igawa
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131017/d8ccf817/attachment.html>