[openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

David Chadwick d.w.chadwick at kent.ac.uk
Fri Nov 29 20:19:18 UTC 2013


Hi Arvind

I have added my two-penneth to the latest version.

I look forward to your comments

regards

David


On 26/11/2013 23:07, Tiwari, Arvind wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> Thanks for your time and valuable comments. I have replied to your comments and try to explain why I am advocating to this BP.
> 
> Let me know your thoughts, please feel free to update below etherpad   
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
> 
> Thanks again,
> Arvind
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Chadwick [mailto:d.w.chadwick at kent.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 12:12 PM
> To: Tiwari, Arvind; OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Cc: Henry Nash; ayoung at redhat.com; dolph.mathews at gmail.com; Yee, Guang
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition
> 
> Hi Arvind
> 
> I have just added some comments to your blueprint page
> 
> regards
> 
> David
> 
> 
> On 19/11/2013 00:01, Tiwari, Arvind wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>  
>>
>> Based on our discussion in design summit , I have redone the service_id
>> binding with roles BP
>> <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/serviceid-binding-with-role-definition>.
>> I have added a new BP (link below) along with detailed use case to
>> support this BP.
>>
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/service-scoped-role-definition
>>
>> Below etherpad link has some proposals for Role REST representation and
>> pros and cons analysis
>>
>>  
>>
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
>>
>>  
>>
>> Please take look and let me know your thoughts.
>>
>>  
>>
>> It would be awesome if we can discuss it in tomorrow's meeting.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Arvind
>>



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list