Open Stack

On 27/11/13 18:12, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2013-11-27 08:09:33 -0800:
>> In the longer term, there seems to be a lot of demand for some sort of
>> template catalog service, like Glance for templates. (I disagree with
>> Clint that it should actually _be_ Glance the project as we know it, for
>> the reasons Steve B mentioned earlier, but the concept is right.) And
>> this brings us back to a very similar situation to the operator-provided
>> template catalog (indeed, that use case would likely be subsumed by this
>> one).
>>
>
> Could you provide a stronger link to Steve B's comments, I think I
> missed them. Thanks!

"Hrm, glance is for large binary data and has a metadata model only for 
OS images - the overlap with the needs of a template catalog don't seem 
very obvious to me."

It was longer and more detailed in my recollection of it :D Sorry!

- ZB