Open Stack

Hi David,

Thanks for your time and valuable comments. I have replied to your comments and try to explain why I am advocating to this BP.

Let me know your thoughts, please feel free to update below etherpad   
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition

Thanks again,
Arvind

-----Original Message-----
From: David Chadwick [mailto:d.w.chadwick at kent.ac.uk] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 12:12 PM
To: Tiwari, Arvind; OpenStack Development Mailing List
Cc: Henry Nash; ayoung at redhat.com; dolph.mathews at gmail.com; Yee, Guang
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

Hi Arvind

I have just added some comments to your blueprint page

regards

David


On 19/11/2013 00:01, Tiwari, Arvind wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
> Based on our discussion in design summit , I have redone the service_id
> binding with roles BP
> <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/serviceid-binding-with-role-definition>.
> I have added a new BP (link below) along with detailed use case to
> support this BP.
> 
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/service-scoped-role-definition
> 
> Below etherpad link has some proposals for Role REST representation and
> pros and cons analysis
> 
>  
> 
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
> 
>  
> 
> Please take look and let me know your thoughts.
> 
>  
> 
> It would be awesome if we can discuss it in tomorrow's meeting.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Arvind
>