[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Summit session wrapup

Jaromir Coufal jcoufal at redhat.com
Mon Nov 25 18:41:00 UTC 2013


Hey Rob,

can we add 'Slick Overcloud deployment through the UI' to the list? 
There was no session about that, but we discussed it afterwords and 
agreed that it is high priority for Icehouse as well.

I just want to keep it on the list, so we are aware of that.

Thanks
-- Jarda

On 2013/25/11 02:17, Robert Collins wrote:
> I've now gone through and done the post summit cleanup of blueprints
> and migration of design docs into blueprints as appropriate.
>
> We had 50 odd blueprints, many of where were really not effective
> blueprints - they described single work items with little coordination
> need, were not changelog items, etc. I've marked those obsolete.
> Blueprints are not a discussion forum - they are a place that [some]
> discussions can be captured, but anything initially filed there will
> take some time before folk notice it - and the lack of a discussion
> mechanism makes it very hard to reach consensus there. Could TripleO
> interested folk please raise things here, on the dev list initially,
> and we'll move it to lower latency // higher bandwidth environments as
> needed?
>
>  From the summit we had the following outcomes
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-deployment-hardware-autodiscovery
> - needs to be done in ironic
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-icehouse-modelling-infrastructure-sla-services
> - needs more discussion to tease concerns out - in particular I want
> us to get to
> a problem statement that Nova core folk understand :)
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-icehouse-ha-production-configuration
> - this is ready for folk to act on at any point
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-tuskar-deployment-scaling-topologies
> - this is ready for folk to act on - but it's fairly shallow, since
> most of the answer was 'discuss with heat' :)
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-icehouse-scaling-design
> - this is ready for folk to act on; the main thing was gathering a
> bunch of data so we can make good decisions from here on out
>
> The stable branches decision has been documented in the wiki - all done.
>
> Cheers,
> Rob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131125/3baccfb3/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list