Open Stack

Adding Jun to this thread since gmail is failing him.


On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Amir Sadoughi <amir.sadoughi at rackspace.com
> wrote:

>  Yes, my work has been on ML2 with neutron-openvswitch-agent.  I’m
> interested to see what Jun Park has. I might have something ready before he
> is available again, but would like to collaborate regardless.
>
>  Amir
>
>
>
>  On Nov 19, 2013, at 3:31 AM, Kanthi P <pavuluri.kanthi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Hi All,
>
>  Thanks for the response!
> Amir,Mike: Is your implementation being done according to ML2 plugin
>
>  Regards,
> Kanthi
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Mike Wilson <geekinutah at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kanthi,
>>
>>  Just to reiterate what Kyle said, we do have an internal implementation
>> using flows that looks very similar to security groups. Jun Park was the
>> guy that wrote this and is looking to get it upstreamed. I think he'll be
>> back in the office late next week. I'll point him to this thread when he's
>> back.
>>
>>  -Mike
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) <
>> kmestery at cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 18, 2013, at 4:26 PM, Kanthi P <pavuluri.kanthi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>  > Hi All,
>>> >
>>> > We are planning to implement quantum security groups using openflows
>>> for ovs plugin instead of iptables which is the case now.
>>> >
>>> > Doing so we can avoid the extra linux bridge which is connected
>>> between the vnet device and the ovs bridge, which is given as a work around
>>> since ovs bridge is not compatible with iptables.
>>> >
>>> > We are planning to create a blueprint and work on it. Could you please
>>> share your views on this
>>> >
>>>  Hi Kanthi:
>>>
>>> Overall, this idea is interesting and removing those extra bridges would
>>> certainly be nice. Some people at Bluehost gave a talk at the Summit [1] in
>>> which they explained they have done something similar, you may want to
>>> reach out to them since they have code for this internally already.
>>>
>>> The OVS plugin is in feature freeze during Icehouse, and will be
>>> deprecated in favor of ML2 [2] at the end of Icehouse. I would advise you
>>> to retarget your work at ML2 when running with the OVS agent instead. The
>>> Neutron team will not accept new features into the OVS plugin anymore.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kyle
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://www.openstack.org/summit/openstack-summit-hong-kong-2013/session-videos/presentation/towards-truly-open-and-commoditized-software-defined-networks-in-openstack
>>> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/ML2
>>>
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Kanthi
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>  _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131125/d2838e02/attachment-0001.html>