Open Stack

I was leading that session and put the comment there - sorry it has lead to confusion - I'll add something to make it clear.

I'm actually drafting the bp at the moment - probably going to split some of the tasks up into different bps (at the suggestion of Dan and Russell).

Is there a particular part you were interested in?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jiang, Yunhong [mailto:yunhong.jiang at intel.com] 
Sent: 14 November 2013 18:20
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][object] One question to the resource tracker session



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.laski at rackspace.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 10:02 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][object] One question to the 
> resource tracker session
> 
> On 11/14/13 at 05:37pm, Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.laski at rackspace.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:22 PM
> >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][object] One question to the
> resource
> >> tracker session
> >>
> >> On 11/13/13 at 11:12pm, Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
> >> >Hi, Dan Smith and all,
> >> >	I noticed followed statement in 'Icehouse tasks' in
> >>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IcehouseNovaExtensibleSchedulerMetr
> >> ics
> >> >
> >> >		convert resource tracker to objects
> >> >		make resoruce tracker extensible
> >> >		no db migrations ever again!!
> >> >		extra specs to cover resources - use a name space
> >> >
> >> >	How is it planned to achieve the 'no db migrations ever again'?
> Even
> >> with the object, we still need keep resource information in database.
> And
> >> when new resource type added, we either add a new column to the
> table.
> >> Or it means we merge all resource information into a single column 
> >> as
> json
> >> string and parse it in the resource tracker object?.
> >>
> >> You're right, it's not really achievable without moving to a 
> >> schemaless persistence model.  I'm fairly certain it was added to 
> >> be humorous and should not be considered an outcome of that session.
> >
> >Andrew, thanks for the explanation. Not sure anyone have interests on
> this task, otherwise I will take it.
> 
> There is a blueprint for part of this from Paul Murray,
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/make-resource-tracker-use-
> objects.
> So you could coordinate the work if you're interested.

Yes, just noticed it and the first 2 sponsor. I will keep an eye on it.

--jyh

> 
> >
> >--jyh
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Thanks
> >> >--jyh
> >> >
> >> >_______________________________________________
> >> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >> >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev