Open Stack

Ha!  Thanks for the feedback.  We'll work to remove the tenant ID from the URI then.

Thanks,
John

________________________________
From: Gabriel Hurley [Gabriel.Hurley at nebula.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 7:47 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Tenant ID in URIs?

If you do put tenant IDs in your URIs, I’ll be coming for you next… ;-)


-          Gabriel

From: Dolph Mathews [mailto:dolph.mathews at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 2:31 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Tenant ID in URIs?


On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com<mailto:jaypipes at gmail.com>> wrote:
On 05/22/2013 03:25 PM, John Wood wrote:
> There appears to be a movement away from having tenant IDs embedded in the URIs of OpenStack services, so we are curious if a new project such as Barbican should omit the tenant ID altogether, utilizing the tenant information in the Keystone token instead.
>
> Please weigh in if you can.
Yes, please avoid using the tenant ID in the URI structure.

-jay

+1


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130523/ade53aa7/attachment.html>